If your theory abut hurricane names stirs up a tempest, then…

Here’s the newest effusion from the hurricane-names authors whose paper stirred up a tempest:

Reply to Christensen and Christensen and to Malter: Pitfalls of erroneous analyses of hurricanes names,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111 no. 34, 2014,  E3499–E3500. They write:

“We are grateful for this opportunity to provide additional support for our conclusions about the role of name femininity in responses to storms.”

BONUS (possibly related, form 2005): Ig Nobel and Hurricane Katrina

Leave a Reply