Not Its Crowning Glory: Regulating Anti-Hair-Loss Products

Some years ago, a law student looked at US government attempts to regulate products that claimed to prevent hair from vanishing. The student — who retained his own head of hair and later became a law professor — wrote this paper:

bradtNot Its Crowning Glory: Obstacles for FDA in Regulating Ingested Dietary Supplements Purporting to Prevent Hair Loss,” Andrew Bradt [pictured here], 2005 Third Year Paper, Harvard Law School. The author explains:

Preventing hair loss is big business in the United States, amounting to over one billion dollars per year. While the industry is dominated by FDA-approved medications, like Propecia and Rogaine and hair transplant surgeries, there are also a variety of herbal remedies on the market with no proof of effectiveness. These products are allowed to exist and to claim to regrow hair or prevent future hair loss thanks to the provisions of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, or DSHEA. This article examines how DSHEA allows these products to remain on the market, potentially defrauding millions of vulnerable Americans seeking to respond to baldness, and offers several possible solutions to the problem.

Patient: Doctor, doctor, can you give me something for my baldness?

Doctor: How about a few pounds of pig manure?

Patient: Will that cure my baldness?

Doctor: No, but with that on your head no one will come near enough to notice you’re bald.

–Old Joke

3 Responses to “Not Its Crowning Glory: Regulating Anti-Hair-Loss Products”

  1. fares Says:

    I had previously experienced hair loss problems but tried the product in the link and found great benefit

    http://www.lnk123.com/aff_c?offer_id=1928&aff_id=364801

  2. Oliver Says:

    Here is a pretty good site for those who want to pay for their homework to be done https://justdomyhomework.com/

  3. mecca Says:

    nice information

Leave a Reply